Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:40979 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40159 of 2024 Petitioner :- Navtappi Respondent :- State Of Up And 18 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to ensure the compliance of the order dated 17.10.2023 passed by himself (Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil- Hata, District- Kushinagar) in Case No. 1098/2016 (Computerized Case No. T20160544021098) "Babulal & others Vs. Ram Chandra & others" Under Section 41 of U.P. Land Revenue Act now Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 within stipulated period which may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that an order dated 17.10.2023 has been passed by respondent No.2 but the same has not been given effect to. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati v. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A and Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others) the writ petition is not maintainable for execution of orders passed by Revenue Court. It has been further submitted by learned Standing Counsel that in view of provisions of paragraph no. 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, the petitioner has remedy for getting the order implemented. For ready reference, paragraph no. 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, is quoted as under: "460. Execution of decree and order- (1) The decree or order passed under the Code or the Rules framed under the Code shall, mutatis mutandis, be executed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter V. (2) The Assistant Collector/Tahsildar passing the order for eviction or recovery of any amount of damages or compensation under the provisions of Section 67 of the Code shall get the order executed and in execution of the order he shall, mutatis mutandis, follow the procedure laid down in paragraphs 137 and 138." 5. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy as available to them under the U.P. Revenue Court Manual. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad