GODDUMARRI ADINARAYANA YADAV v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/2711/2025 · 2025-03-12
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10951 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10951 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2711 OF 2025 Between;
1. Goddumarri Adinarayana Yadav, S/o.Pedda Bayanna, Aged 45 R/o.D.No. 11-2-351-1, Plot No. 101, Srinivasam Residency, Naik Nagar, Ananthapur.
2. D. Ravindra @ Dampetia Ravi, S/o. Surendra, Aged 36 years, R/o. D.N0.5-157-B, B Kottala, Sankepalli Village, Mudigubba Ananthapuram District. years Mandal, ...PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No’s. 1 & 2 AND
1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor Court at Amaravathi, Through Sub-Inspector of Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District,
2. G. Prabhakar, S/o.Narasimhulu, Aged 57 years, R/o.D.No.20-198 Hanumesh Nagar, Guntakal Town, Ananthapur District High KIA Police ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal praying that in the Petition,
the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.65 of 2024 on the file of KIA Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 202.4 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of Crime 2024 on the file of KIA Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 202.4 praying that in the No.65 of Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further Petition, proceedings in Crime No.65 of 2024 on the file of KIA Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and Sravan Kumar Naidana, Advocate for Prosecutor (AP) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 The Court made the following ORDER : upon hearing the arguments of Sri the Petitioner and the Public
APHC010125702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2711/2025 Between: Goddumarri Adinarayana Yadav and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT{S) HARINATH.N,J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION No.2711 OF 2025
ORDER:
1. This criminal petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.65 of 2024 of KIA Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District, registered against the petitioners for the alleged offences under Sections 118, 324(4), 324(5) 329(3), 351 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were arraigned as A.1 and A.2 in Crime No. 65 of 2024 at KIA Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District, based on the complaint of the 2'^'^ respondent. In the complaint, the 2"'^ respondent alleged that the petitioners, along with 12 others, trespassed into his land, damaged the cement fencing poles and attacked him. The
learned counsel further submits that the petitioners are in no way connected with the allegations made in the complaint and were falsely implicated in the case.
4. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State submits that the crime is at the stage of investigation.
5. The learned counsel further submits that the offences alleged against the petitioners are punishable below 7 years and, therefore, seeks a CONTD...2P..
-2- CRLP. IM0.27110F 202s the procedure provided under Section Sanhita, 2023. of the learned counsel for the direction to the police to follow 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
6. Considering the submissions this Court deems it directing the Investigation Officer/ petitioners, appropriate to dispose off the criminal petition by Station House Officer, KIA Police station, Sri Sathya Sai District, to follow the procedure as contemplated Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik for the purpose of investigation iin connection with Crime No.65 of 2024.
7. Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed off.
8. Miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in the criminal petition shall Stand closed.
SD/- A.VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Station House Officer, KIA Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District.
2. One CC to Sri Sravan Kumar Naidana, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. [OUT]
4. Three CD Copies MV TAC
HIGH COURT DATED; 12/03/2025
ORDER CRLP.No.2711 of 2025 S’ 02 APR 2® I Current Section ^ disposing of the crlp