Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1095 (HP)

NEETA KUMARI v. MADAN LAL

CRMPM/2862/2025 · 2026-03-24

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neeta Kumari versus Madan Lal Cr. MP(M) No.2862 of 2025 24.03.2026 Present: Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. Cr.MP No.5398 of 2025 As main application [Cr.MP(M) No.2862 of 2025] has been entertained and notice was issued to respondent on 15.12.2025, therefore, this application is disposed of as deemed to have been allowed. Cr. MP(M) No.2862 of 2025 Respondent stands duly served; however, he has not chosen to be represented and is, therefore, proceeded against ex parte for adjudication of this application. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for applicant and averments made in application, the delay of 40 days in filing the revision petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No._______ of 2026 [Cr.Rev (FC) ST No.4666 of 2025] Be registered. Records be requisitioned. Notice to sole respondent, returnable on next date, be issued, on taking steps within three days. List on 18.06.2026. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) March 24, 2026 Judge [Shivender]