2025:HHC:1643 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No. 89 of 2022 Date of decision: 8 .1.202 5 Sunita Kumari. …Petitioner. Versus Raj Kumari & ohers …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner. Ms.Dhanwanti, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms.Shashi Kiran, Advocate, vice Ms.Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Ms.Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 2 and 3. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that Civil Suit No. 22-1 of 2019, titled as Raj Kumari Vs. State of H.P., has been disposed of by the Trial Court with observation that issue involved in the matter was exclusively falling within the domain of Family Court and, therefore, present petition, which was filed against the order passed by the Trial Court closing the right to file written statement has now become infructuous, in view of subsequent events. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes 2025:HHC:1643 Civil Revision No. 89 of 2022 2. In view of above, present petition is disposed of being infructuous. (Vivek Singh Thakur), 8th January, 2025 Judge. (Keshav) 2