1 W.P.(C) No. 1828 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1828 of 2018 --- 1. Md. Alauddin son of Md. Hanif, resident of village- Kolghatti, P.O.- Reformatory School, P.S.- Sadar, District- Hazaribagh 2. Md. Salim son of Kallu Mian, resident of village- Madaikela, P.O.- Reformatory School, P.S.- Sadar, District- Hazaribagh 3. Md. Ali Hasan, son of Hanif, resident of village- Madaikela, P.O.- Reformatory School, P.S.- Sadar, District- Hazaribagh 4. Md. Mahzad Alam son of Aziz Mian, resident of Ward No.-1, 155 Noora, Mahto Gali, P.S.- Sadar, District- Hazaribagh 5.Md. Mashrur Ahamad son of Badruddin, resident of Village- Lakhe, P.S.- Majassil, P.O.- Korra, District- Hazaribagh 6. Md. Phool Mahammad son of Md. Shabib, resident of opposite Veterinary Hospital, P.S.- Sadar, District- Hazaribagh 7. Md. Jishan son of Md. Aslam Khan, resident of resident of village- Madai Kala, P.O.- Reformatory School, P.S.- Sadar, District- Hazaribagh … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 3. The Khas Mahal Officer, Hazaribagh 4. The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Hazaribagh …. … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : M/s A.K. Rashidi, Alia Begum & Md. Azam, Advocates For the Resp.-Nos. 1 to 3 : Mrs. Sweta Shukla, A.C. to A.A.G.-II Fort the Resp. No. 4 : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate Order No. 07 Dated: 04.02.2025 The present writ petition has been filed for restraining the respondents from disturbing the petitioners from their respective shops and also for directing the concerned respondent to renew lease in terms with rule 17 of the Jharkhand Government Estates (Khas Mahal) Manual, 1953 read 2 W.P.(C) No. 1828 of 2018 with the provisions of Jharkhand Government Estates (Khas Mahal) Manual, 1955 as well as in terms with Government Notification Nos. 6053-R dated 09.08.1953, 3323-R dated 24.04.1954 and 9294-R dated 27.10.1961. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of prayer made by the petitioners in the present writ petition, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioners are given liberty to prefer a fresh representation(s) on the present issue before the Khas Mahal Officer, Hazaribagh (the respondent no. 3). On receipt of the said representation(s), the respondent no. 3, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners/their representatives, shall take an appropriate informed decision within eight weeks from the date of filing of the said representation(s). 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid liberty and direction. Ritesh/ (Rajesh Shankar, J.)