Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:38634 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11729 of 2024 Applicant :- Pintu Dorli Alias Amrish Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Yadav,Vishwadeep Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- Arun Kumar Tripathi, Madhup Vishwas,G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned AGA for the State- opposite party, and Sri Arun Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant, and perused the material available on record. 2. This application under section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 319 of 2023, under Sections 406, 420 I.P.C., Police Station Medical College, District Meerut. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The disputed amount was credited in the account of M/s Shephalika Developers and Promoters and Shri Nath Developers and Promoters. The applicant has no concern with the alleged companies. No amount was credited in the account of the applicant. The applicant is not a beneficiary of the illicit transactions. The case of the applicant is clearly distinguishable from that of the proprietors of the two firms. No offence is made out against the applicant. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Investigation has been completed. The applicant had cooperated in the investigation. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicant has been summoned by the court concerned. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 4. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, considering the nature of accusations and
antecedents of the applicant and, in particular, the fact that the disputed amount was credited in the account of M/s Shephalika Developers and Promoters and Shri Nath Developers and Promoters; at this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence; the applicant had cooperated in the investigation and no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 6.
6. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Pintu Dorli alias Amrish Kumar, involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available on each and every date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the concerned court.
7. Further, in default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same.
8. The application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 18.3.2025 SKT/- Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad