IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 261 CRM-M-63978-2024 Date of decision : 17.09.2025 SHEELA DEVI ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, Asst. A.G. Haryana. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1. It has been contended by learned State counsel that the petitioner herself has sworn an affidavit in which she has requested that the FIR lodged by her may not be investigated and case may be closed. The photocopy of such affidavit has been placed on record by learned State counsel. 2. In addition to above, it has also been informed that in the present case, cancellation report has already been prepared by the Investigating Officer and the same has been submitted before the Court of learned Area Magistrate. 3. In view of above mentioned developments, no cause for the survival of present petition exists. VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.18 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-63978-2024 2 4. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed being infructuous. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 17.09.2025 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.18 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order