Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109434 (ALL)

DINESH CHANDRA SHARMA v. State of UP AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/19115/2024 · 2025-03-18

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19115 of 2024 Petitioner :- Dinesh Chandra Sharma Respondent :- State Of Up And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has rendered infructuous as subsistence allowance has already made, however, he contends that since subsistence allowance was wholly, illegally withheld, petitioner is entitled for interest also. In the above regard, petitioner may make representation within a period of four weeks from today before the Competent authority who may decide the same within a further period of four weeks. In view of aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records as an infructuous matter. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Sanjeev Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad