IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4978 of 2025 Decided on: 4th April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanjeev Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikrant, Advocate vice Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Since the body of the writ petition is different from the list of events and the relief clause is also at tangent with the list of events and body of petition, learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law. Granting such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 04, 2025 Judge Mukesh 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.