Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10938 (AP)

RAVILLA VINOD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/6248/2025 · 2025-03-24

K Manmadha Rao, R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 RRR,J & Dr. KMR,J W.P.No.6248/2025 APHC010125322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3525] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 6248/2025 Between: Ravilla Vinod ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y V S S DHARANEESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Heard Y.V.S.S. Dharaneesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader in the office of the learned Advocate General. 2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition contending that his wife has been forcibly detained by his in-laws. The petitioner further 2 RRR,J & Dr. KMR,J W.P.No.6248/2025 contends that he is married to the alleged detenue and she has been detained after their marriage, when she went to her village for Sankranthi festival. 3. After the notice was served, the petitioner and the alleged detenue are personally present in the Court. 4. We have interacted with the alleged detenue in the chambers. She has stated that she is married to the petitioner. However, she has moved back to her parents’ house due to differences between her and the petitioner. She states that she has not been detained by any person and she is free to move around. She has also stated that she would be taking employment and for such purpose she would be staying in the city or town where she would get employment. In the circumstances, nothing further survives in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any shall stand closed. _______________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J _______________________ Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J Js. 3 RRR,J & Dr. KMR,J W.P.No.6248/2025 THE HON’ABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITIONER No.6248 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R Raghunandan Rao) 24th March, 2025 Js