Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10936 (RAJ)

MURARI LAL v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/5677/2002 · 2025-09-10

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36469] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5677/2002 Murari Lal S/o Shri Ram Bharosi Lal, age about 44 years, R/o Bhamtipura, Dholpur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through the Chief Secretary to the Government, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary to the Government, Law and Legal Affairs Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The District & Sessions Judge, Dholpur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5452/2002 Promod Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Ram Bharosi Lal Gupta, age about 32 years, R/o Near Nagarpalika, Dholpur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through the Chief Secretary to the Government, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary To The Government, Law and Legal Affairs Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The District And Sessions Judge, Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pareek with Ms. Rani Bhandari Mr. Deepak Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lalit Bhardwaj for Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 10/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite his best efforts, he is not getting proper instructions from the client, and in the absence of such instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to argue the matters. [2025:RJ-JP:36469] (2 of 2) [CW-5677/2002] 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. However, the petitioners are at liberty to file an application for revival of the writ petitions if the cause of action still survives. 4. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-8 & 10