Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10936 (JHR)

RAMSWARUP YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3318/2025 · 2025-06-13

Rajesh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:15624 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3318 of 2025 ---- Ramswarup Yadav, aged about 27 years, son of Suresh Yadav, resident of Village Akauna, P.O. Chatra & P.S. Chatra, District-Chatra …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Shashikant Jaiswal, Adv. For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P. ---- 03/Dated: 13th June, 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicant, who is in custody since 31.03.2023, has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T No.306 of 2023, arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No.69 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 302 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional District Judge-I, Chatra. 3. The prayer for bail of the applicant was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 31.01.2024 passed in B.A No.10217 of 2023 and thereafter, his prayer for bail was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 28.02.2025 passed in B.A No.8267 of 2024. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that there is an improvement in the statement of the witnesses. As per the FIR, it was omnibus allegation against the person, but during the evidence, it has been specified to the present witness so far as the fatal blow is concerned. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and it has been submitted that there is specific allegation against this applicant. 2025:JHHC:15624 7. In compliance of the court’s order, a report has been submitted by the Trial Court and from perusal of the same, it appears that all the charge-sheeted witnesses have been examined, but seizure list witness are yet to be examined and for that the case is at the stage of evidence. 8. Considering the above facts and the period of custody, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District Judge-I, Chatra in connection with S.T No.306 of 2023, arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No.69 of 2023, subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned court below which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.MohantyRaja/- Uploaded Page No.2 B.A No.3318 of 2025