Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10935 (UTT)

KRIPAL DUTT JOSHI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2215/2020 · 2025-06-13

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2215 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that after investigation a charge sheet dated 06.02.2021 has been submitted against petitioner. 4. In view of the submission made by counsel for the State, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum under appropriate provision of law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 13.06.2025 SK