HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- WP(C) No.2315/2021 Hari Chand ….. Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Narinder Kumar Attri, Advocate Vs UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. P.S. Salaria, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (25.11.2025) 1. In view of the intervening development which came to take place post filing of the writ petition. Mr. Narinder Kumar Attri, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ purpose has been rendered infructuous, as such, the writ petition is allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the respective status of the parties vis-à-vis the land in reference. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn. . (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 25.11.2025 Sneha Serial No. 08