1 2025:CGHC:10744 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1611 of 2025 1 - Shrimati Yamuna Singh W/o Shree Bhojsingh Rajput Aged About 39 Years Occupation- Rasoiya/safaikarmi/danik Majdoor Sash. Pri.Mai. Anusuchit Jati Kanya Chatravash- Sakti, Niwasi- Ward No.- 18, Vikashkhand Sakti Jila- Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Sachiv, Aadim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikash Vibhag, Mantralaya Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Aayukt Aadim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikash Raipur Jila Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Sahayak Aayukt Aadivashi Vikash Sakti Jila- Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Collector Jila- Sakti C.G. 5 - Adhichak Sash.Pri.Mai.Anu. Jati Kanya Chatravash Sakti, Vikaskhand- Sakti Jila- Sakti C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate For State/Respondent(s) : Ms. Akanksha Verma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 05/03/2025 1. The limited grievance that the petitioner has in the instant case is the action on the part of the respondents in discontinuing the services of petitioner. 2. According to the counsel for petitioner, petitioner was working as daily wage employee under the respondents and suddenly, the services of the petitioner was discontinued. Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 3. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instruction to State that there is availability of work in the department and they are also in need of daily wage employees, however, ignoring the claim of petitioner for said work they are appointing third persons against the said post. 4. The only prayer that the petitioner is praying for at this juncture is that, if at all, if the respondents intend to engage daily wage workers, let the petitioner be given some preferential right and to be continued instead of appointing fresh personnel. The respondents be directed to take work from the petitioner considering her experience and the length of service rendered by her. 5. Given the said grievance that the petitioner has, the writ petition at this juncture is disposed of directing the respondents to look into the grievance of petitioner and try to redress the same as far as possible by re-engaging the petitioner, if at all if the State or the respondents intend to get work from the daily wage workers. Under such circumstances, the petitioner be given due weightage for the services that she had already rendered in the past. 6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shayna