IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 466/2025 Decided on: 26.05.2025 Mohinder Singh ...…Petitioner Versus Kadam Sandeep Vasant & Anr. …….Respondents …………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Onkar Jairath For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Mr. Kadam Sandeep Vasant, Secretary, present in person. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Petitioner’s case is that the office order dated 15.02.2025 issued by respondent No.1 (Annexure P-2) contravenes the directions issued in Mahinder Singh Vs. State of H.P. & Anr.2 2. Learned Additional Advocate General on the basis of instructions imparted by respondent No.1, who has attended the hearing, submitted that office order dated 15.02.2025 (Annexure P- 2) be treated as withdrawn and that respondent No.1 shall decide the case of the petitioner afresh, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2CWP No. 2968/2021 decided on 06.09.2024 2 3. In view of above submissions, the contempt petition is closed. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 26, 2025 rohit