KANCHAN PAL @ KANCHAN TIRKEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/41942/2024 · 2025-08-22
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 109293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 109293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:146423 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41942 of 2024 Applicant :- Kanchan Pal @ Kanchan Tirkey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sonu Kumar Tiwari,G.A. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning.
2. Heard Sri Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Yogesh Kumar Tripathi, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sonu Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Ashish Kumar Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1.
3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 29.06.2024, cognizance
order dated 23.07.2024, in Criminal Case No.12554 of 2024(State Vs. Kanchan Pal @ Kanchan Tirkey), arising out of Case Crime No.382 of 2023, under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, IPC, Police Station Mugalsarai, District Chandauli, as well a entire proceeding of the aforesaid case, on the basis of compromise.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned counsel for the applicant further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicant and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above
submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant.
6. In view of the fact that applicant and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicant. 7 In view of the aforesaid, the impugned charge sheet dated 29.06.2024, cognizance order dated 23.07.2024, in Criminal Case No.12554 of 2024(State Vs. Kanchan Pal @ Kanchan Tirkey), arising out of Case Crime No.382 of 2023, under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, IPC, Police Station Mugalsarai, District Chandauli, as well a entire proceeding of the aforesaid case, are hereby quashed.
8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed.
Order Date :- 23.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad