Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10929 (JHR)

TATA MOTORS LIMITED THROUGH ITS DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY ANAND VARDHAN v. SANTOSH KUMAR

LPA/344/2025 · 2025-08-25

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:25098-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 344 of 2025 Tata Motors Limited (previously known as Tata Engineering & Locomotive Company Limited), having its registered office at 24 Homi Mody Street, Fort Mumbai and its works at Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.-Telco, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand, through its duly constituted Attorney, Anand Vardhan, S/o Late K.P. Singh, General Manager, Legal Services, R/o Town-Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.-Telco, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand ….. Appellant Versus Santosh Kumar, R/o P.O. & P.S.-Chota Govindpur, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand ….. Respondent With L.P.A. No. 384 of 2025 Tata Motors Limited (previously known as Tata Engineering & Locomotive Company Limited), having its registered office at 24 Homi Mody Street, Fort Mumbai and its works at Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.-Telco, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand, through Anand Vardhan, S/o Late K.P. Singh, General Manager, Legal Services, R/o Town-Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.- Telco, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand ….. Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Department of Labour, Ranchi 2. Santosh Kumar, S/o Shri M.L. Sah, R/o P.O. & P.S.-Chota Govindpur, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand ….. Respondents ----- CORAM HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Appellant: Ms. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents: - ----- 03/25.08.2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that she has got instruction not to press the present appeals with liberty to the appellant to avail appropriate remedy as available under law. 2. Considering the said submission of learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeals are dismissed as not pressed. 2025:JHHC:25098-DB 2 3. In case, such liberty is resorted to by initiating appropriate proceedings within a period of 30 days, the period of limitation shall not come in the way of the appellant while computing the period of limitation for such proceedings in view of the fact that the matters remained pending before this Court since 04.04.2025 and 05.05.2025 respectively. (TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.) Satish/Vikas/ (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)