IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6580 OF 2025 Between: Shaik Syed Meer, S/o. Shaik Khaleel Saheb, Aged about 50 years, Occ; State President, ACBI N.G.O, R/o. Flat No. 102, Anna Apartment, Subash Nagar, Korlakunta, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its PrincipalSecretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh State, Office at Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District at Tirupati. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Tirupati East Police Station, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 5. The Station House Officer, Tirupati East P.S, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 6. N. Naseeb, S/o. M. K. Rahman, Age 42 years, Occ Junior Assistant, R/o Flat No.201, Anna Apartment, Subash Nagar, Korlakunta, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. 7. Munwar Sulthana, D/o. M. K. Rahman, Age 50 years, Occ B.S.N.L Employee, R/o Flat No.201, Anna Apartment, Subash Nagar, Korlakunta, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Erstwhile Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein in not registering the F.I.R on the petitioners complaint, Dt.06.02.2025 and 01.03.2025 inspite of repeated requests. , ^ though it is a cognizable offence, as nothing but illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the Judgment in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and consequently direct the Respondents, to register the F.I.R on the petitioners complaint Dt. 06.02.2025 and 01.03.2025. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents, to take action by registering the F.I.R, on the petitioners complaint Dt. 06.02.2025 and 01.03.2025, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon’ble court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7 : NONE APPEARED The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA APHC010125342025 PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6580/2025 [3457] Between: ...PETITIONER Shaik Syed Meer AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned I Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home. ] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner 2. is aggrieved by the inaction of respondent Nos.3 & 5 in not considering the petitioner's complaints dated 06.02.2025 and 01.03.2025. 2 Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the 3. Home submits that the petitioner’s complaints dated 06.02.2025 and 01.03.2025 will be considered by the respondents, as per law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this 4. Court is inclined to dispose off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing respondent Nos.3 & 5 to consider the petitioner’s complaints dated 06.02.2025 and 01.03.2025, in accordance with law and as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173 (3) of BNSS, 2023. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall 5. be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall Sd/- M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1 To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh State, Office at Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District at Tirupati. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Tirupati East Police Station, Tirupati Tirupati District. ’ 5. The Station House Officer, Tirupati East P.S, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 6. One CC to Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr T HIGH COURT DATED:18/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.6580 of 2025 5? X 27 MAR 2025 O ^ , Current Section ^ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT THE STAGE OF ADMISION WITHOUT COSTS