HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5371/2025 Ekta Pandey D/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Pandey, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Village Kolaheda,tehsil Narayanpur, District Kotputli- Behror. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Ambedkar Bhawan, Jaipur 3. Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan, Siksha Sankul J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. 4. Nodal Officer, Govt. Gauri Devi Govt. Mahila College, Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chand Sharma For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/04/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer: “(i) by appropriate writ order or direction the respondents may be directed to distribute the scooty to the petitioner under the Kalibai Bhim Meghavi students Scooty Scheme session 2023-24 by correcting the department of scheme as school edication in place of College Education in her online (2 of 3) [CW-5371/2025] application form and also be considering her evaluating marks i.e. 90.20% marks. (ii) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be given in favour of the petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents for disbursement of Scooty to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner belongs to category of EWS and she applied online for getting the benefit of scooty under the scheme, on the basis of her merit position. Counsel submits that after three merit lists, when final merit list was prepared by the respondents, name of the petitioner was there in the list of eligible candidates to get Scooty, but there was inadvertent mistake on the part of the petitioner, while addressing the application to the Department of College Education instead of School Education. Counsel submits that at the time of submission of the application form, the marks of the petitioner were 88%, which were increased to 90.20% in re-evaluation and all these facts were brought into notice of the respondents by way of filing a detailed representation on 27.12.2024. Counsel submits that in-spite of passing of considerable time, till date, the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the respondents by passing a reasoned and speaking order, therefore, appropriate directions be issued to the respondents to decide the same expeditiously within a time frame. 4. Considering the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this (3 of 3) [CW-5371/2025] petition by issuing directions to the respondents to decide the representation/application of the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 5. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 6. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way, thus, they would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/34