Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109224 (ALL)

RAJENDRA PRASAD AND ANOTHER v. State of UP AND 12 OTHERS

HABC/969/2024 · 2025-01-22

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:11331 Court No. - 79 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 969 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R S Dubey,Rajesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State. 2. The instant habeas corpus writ petition has been preferred with following prayers:- "i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus to produce the petitioner no. 2 before this Hon'ble Court to secure the life and personal liberty of the corpus, who is illegally detained by respondent No. 4 to 13 against her wishes." 3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that the private respondents regularly committing 'maar-peet' with petitioner no. 2 (corpus) and also demanded additional dowry and due to non- fulfillment of illegal demand, the petitioner no. 2 (corpus) is prohibited to meet any person. In this regard the petitioner no. 1 lodged an FIR as Case Crime No. 259 of 2024 under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) BNS and 3/4 of D.P. Act. 4. The entire allegation whatsoever has been put-forward through the instant petition is subject matter of the investigation, which is pending in Case Crime No. 259 of 2024 and as such there is hardly any cause of action available at this stage for institution of the instant petition. 5. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad