Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10920 (ALL)

POONAM DIXIT v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/2424/2025 · 2025-01-24

Siddhartha Varma, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12656-DB Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2424 of 2025 Petitioner :- Poonam Dixit Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Nath Dubey,Upendra Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Udit Chandra Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel appearing for the Electricity Department. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the petitioner had never taken any electricity connection in her name. 3. Sri Nitesh Patel, learned counsel appearing for the Electricity Department states that as per the Clause 6.5(a) of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code the petitioner can get this mistake rectified by approaching the relevant authority under the relevant clause i.e Clause 6.5(a) of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code. 4. Without going into the merits of the case, we direct that if the petitioner moves an application under Clause 6.5(a) of the Electricity Supply Code within a period of 10 days then the same shall be decided within a period of one month. 5. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 M.S. Ansari (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad