The Food Corporation of India v. Sri Ratan Bardhan
Review Pet./26/2024 · 2025-06-23
S Datta Purkayastha
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1092 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1092 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
IA No. 1 of 2024 in Review Pet. No.26 of 2024 Review Pet. No.26 of 2024
1. The Food Corporation of India, represented by its Chairman-cum- Managing Director, having its Head Office at 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi-110001. 2. The General Manager (Region), Food Corporation of India, NEF Region, Mawlai, Mawroh, Shillong, Meghalaya – 793008. 3. The Executive Director (Zone), FCI Zonal Office, Guwahati – 781007. 4. The Divisional Manager (erstwhile Area manager), Food Corporation of India, Divisional Office, Opp. Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala, West Tripura – 799006. ……… Applicant/ Petitioner (s). V E R S U S Sri Ratan Bardhan, Son of Late Chandranath Bardhan, resident of Shibbari Road, Tarapur, Silchar, District – Cachar, Assam. ………Respondent(s). IA No. 1 of 2024 in Review Pet. No.20 of 2025 Review Pet. No.20 of 2025
1. The Food Corporation of India, having its registered office at 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi-110001, represented by its General Manager (R), NEF Region, Mawlai, Mawroh, Shillong, Meghalaya-
793008. 2. The Divisional Manager (erstwhile Area manager), Food Corporation of India, Divisional Office, Opp. Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala, West Tripura – 799006. ……… Applicant/ Petitioner (s). V E R S U S Sri Ratan Bardhan, Son of Late Chandranath Bardhan, resident of Shibbari Road, Tarapur, Silchar, District – Cachar, Assam. ………Respondent(s). For Applicant/Petitioner(s) : Mr. Binode Kumar Singh, Advocate. For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Indarajit Chakraborty, Advocate. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. PURKAYASTHA
_O_R_D_E_R_
23/06/2025
Review Petition No.26/2024 and Review Petition No.20/2025 are directed against the common impugned judgment and order dated 27.03.2024
passed by this Court in R.F.A. No.03/2016 along with R.F.A. No.04/2020. By the said impugned judgment and order dated 27.03.2024, R.F.A No.03/2016 was partly allowed and R.F.A. No.04/2020 was dismissed. Review Pet. No.26/2024 suffers from a delay of 54 days and Review Pet. No.20 of 2025 suffers from a delay of 199 days for condonation of which I.A. No.1/2024 in Review Pet. No.26/2024 and I.A. No.1/2024 in Review Pet. No.20/2025 have been preferred respectively. We have entertained arguments on the merits of both the review petitions as well while hearing the interlocutory applications. However, after some arguments, Mr.
Binode Kumar Singh, learned counsel, appearing for the review petitioners, on instructions from the official of the Food Corporation of India present in Court, seeks permission to withdraw both the review petitions. Accordingly, both the review petitions [Review Pet. No.26/2024 and Review Pet. No.20/2025] are dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. No.1/2024 in Review Pet. No.26/2024 and I.A. No.1/2024 in Review Pet. No.20/2025 are disposed of. Pending application(s) if any, shall stand disposed of. (S. D. PURKAYASTHA), J (APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ
Munna S MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA Date: 2025.06.24 15:25:18 +05'30'