Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10916 (GAU)

SEKHABAR ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./1219/2025 · 2025-06-15

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010080002025 2025:GAU-AS:7881 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1219/2025 SEKHABAR ALI S/O-LATE HARI DAS TALUKDAR, R/O-VILL- TANGABARI, P. S. -DUDHNOI, DISTRICT-GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F HAQUE, MR A ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 16.06.2025 1. Heard Mr. F. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. This application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the petitioner, Sekhabar Ali, who is facing trial in Sessions Case No.06/2025, pending in the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Goalpara has prayed for releasing him on bail. Page No.# 2/2 3. One person was brutally killed on the day of occurrence. In the FIR, the allegation is that the present petitioner also took part in the said offence. The prosecution has already examined 4(four) witnesses. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has already spent more than one year in Judicial Custody and his period of detention already undergone should be taken as a ground for releasing him bail. 5. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for both the sides, this Court is of the opinion that at this stage the bail application of the petitioner does not deserve to be considered. 6. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is rejected and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant