Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10910 (JK)

JAGDISH RAJ v. RAJ KUMAR GOEL COMMISSIONER SECRETARY HOME DEPTT AND OTHERS

CCP(S)/283/2022 · 2025-04-30

Javed Iqbal Wani

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP(S) No. 283/2022 in WP(C) No. 816/2021 Jagdish Raj ….Petitioner (s) Through :- Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, Advocate. V/s Raj Kumar Goel, Commissioner Secretary, Home Deptt. and Ors. ….Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE ORDER 30.04.2025 1. In the instant petition, the petitioner has alleged non-compliance of order dated 21.05.2022 whereunder, the respondents came to be directed to pay the enhanced honorarium to the petitioner in terms of Government Order dated 02.08.2019 within a period of three months from the date of service of order. 2. Upon coming of the instant petition for consideration, the counsel for the respondents/contemnors produced a copy of order No. 29.04.2025 and would contend that the order, non-compliance of which, is alleged stands complied with and enhanced honorarium stands paid to the petitioner in terms of Government Order dated 02.08.2019. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid position obtaining in the matter, seemingly, the respondent/ contemnor have complied with order dated 21.05.2022. Sr. No. 66 2 4. The contempt notice issued is recalled and the contempt proceedings are closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition within four weeks’ time in case the cause survives. (Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge Jammu: 30.04.2025. Neha-1 Neha Kumari 2025.05.05 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document