202/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA GURDISH SINGH KAMAL KISHOR YADAV IAS AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Upjit Singh Brar, Advocate and Mr. Pankaj Rana, Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, DAG, Punjab HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for the respondents relies upon office order dated 07.04.2025 prescribing the schedule for discharge of liability towards arrears, the same is taken on record as Mark been undertaken on behalf of the respondents that the said schedule shall be followed in true letter and spirit while releasing th the petitioners. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, seeks liberty to revive the same in case, schedule i.e. Mark Dismissed as not pressed Rule discharged. 24.04.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: GURDISH SINGH AND ORS Versus KAMAL KISHOR YADAV IAS AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Upjit Singh Brar, Advocate and Mr. Pankaj Rana, Advocate for the Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, DAG, Punjab **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents relies upon office order .2025 prescribing the schedule for discharge of liability towards arrears, the same is taken on record as Mark been undertaken on behalf of the respondents that the said schedule shall be followed in true letter and spirit while releasing th the petitioners. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, seeks liberty to revive the same in case, schedule i.e. Mark-X is not adhered to by the respondents. Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. Rule discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5146-2024 Date of Decision: April 24, 2025 .......Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Upjit Singh Brar, Advocate and Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel for the respondents relies upon office order .2025 prescribing the schedule for discharge of liability towards arrears, the same is taken on record as Mark-X. It has also been undertaken on behalf of the respondents that the said schedule shall be followed in true letter and spirit while releasing the benefits to In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, seeks liberty to revive the same in X is not adhered to by the respondents. with aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 4 April 24, 2025 Learned counsel for the respondents relies upon office order .2025 prescribing the schedule for discharge of liability X. It has also been undertaken on behalf of the respondents that the said schedule e benefits to In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, seeks liberty to revive the same in TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.25 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document