[2025:JHHC:26178] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3144 of 2025 ------ Rohit Ranjan Tiwari, aged about 23 years, Son of Pravin Kumar Tiwari @ Praveen Kumar Tiwary, Resident of Ward No-4, Village- Potma, P.O- Lagma, P.S- Garhwa, District- Garhwa .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Choubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.05 Dated-29-08-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Garhwa Town P.S. Case No.179 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.617 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery and looted Rs.13,000/- from the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.04.2024 as is evident from para-17 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State on the other hand opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that keeping in view the overwhelming materials available in the record and as the petitioner was identified in the T.I. Parade as well as serious nature of allegation against the petitioner, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and indulging in similar offence, if released on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner ought not to be released on bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner and the chance of his absconding and indulging in similar offence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the above named petitioner to bail. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the abovenamed petitioner is rejected. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/