Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109062 (ALL)

SRI KRISHNA PRIVATE I.T.I. PUNARWALI ROAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/42349/2024 · 2025-03-02

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:29484 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42349 of 2024 Petitioner :- Sri Krishna Private I.T.I. Punarwali Road Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravikant Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Prem Narayan Rai,C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 & 3 to conduct the examination of second year and result of first year as mentioned the representation dated 14.08.2023. 3. The petitioner is the Manager of Sri Krishna Private I.T.I. Punarwali Road, Raksha, Jhansi and at present there is 20 students in the College. The petitioner moved an application to the Combined Director of Rajkiya Audyogic Prashikshan Sansthan, Jhansi, respondent no.3 for conducting the examinnation of the second year of 20 students. Thereafter, petitioner moved several applications/representations to the higher authorities, but no action was taken by the concerned authorities on the request of the petitioner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 5. In such view of the fact, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.2-Joint Director, T.C. Government of India, Ministry, Skills Development of Director General of Training, New Delhi along with a certified copy of this order, raising all his grievances within a period of one month from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a period of one month thereafter. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 NS Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad