Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109061 (ALL)

KHURSHEED AHMAD v. State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/19317/2024 · 2025-01-31

Neeraj Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:14835 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19317 of 2024 Petitioner :- Khursheed Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the State-respondents. 3. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "i). Issue a writ order direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the respondent authority to take appropriate decision upon the representation of petitioners dated 13.05.2024 within stipulated period." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed representation dated 05.11.2024 before respondent No. 2, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid representation within a stipulated time, for which learned standing counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 05.11.2024 in accordance with law maximum within period of six weeks from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 ADY Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad