MONIRUZAMAN CHOUDHURY v. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
WP(C)/2059/2025 · 2025-05-04
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10906 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10906 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010079742025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2059/2025 MONIRUZAMAN CHOUDHURY S/O-LATE IRSHAD ALI CHOUDHURY,R/O-VILL-LALA PART- I(LALAPUR),P.O-CHANDRAPUR,P.S-LALA,DIST-HAILAKANDI,ASSAM,PIN- 788163 2: NURUZZAMAN CHOUDHURY S/O-LATE IRSHAD ALI CHOUDHURY R/O-VILL-LALA PART-I(LALAPUR) P.O-CHANDRAPUR P.S-LALA DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788163 3: SAIFUZZAMAN ALIAS SAIFUZZAMAN CHOUDHURY S/O-LATE IRSHAD ALI CHOUDHURY R/O-VILL-LALA PART-I(LALAPUR) P.O-CHANDRAPUR P.S-LALA DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788163 4: ALOMARA CHOUDHURY D/O-LATE IRSHAD ALI CHOUDHURY R/O-VILL-LALA PART-I(LALAPUR) P.O-CHANDRAPUR P.S-LALA DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788163 5: HENA CHOUDHURY D/O-LATE IRSHAD ALI CHOUDHURY
Page No.# 2/3 R/O-VILL-LALA PART-I(LALAPUR) P.O-CHANDRAPUR P.S-LALA DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788163 6: JAHANARA BEGUM CHOUDHURY D/O-LATE IRSHAD ALI CHOUDHURY R/O-VILL-NIZ-VERNARPUR PART-I P.O-VERNARPUR P.S-LALA DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788163 7: RAHENARA LASKAR D/O-LATE IRSHAD ALI CHOUDHURY R/O-VILL-UTTARJYOSTNABAD P.O-LALMUKH P.S-LALA DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-78816 VERSUS THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HAILAKANDI,P.O AND DISTRICT-HAILAKANDI,ASSAM,PIN-788151 2:SAMSUZZAMAN CHOUDHURY S/O-LATE IRSHAD ALI CHOUDHURY R/O-VILL-LALA PART-I(LALAPUR) P.O-CHANDRAPUR P.S-LALA DIST-HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-78816 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H I CHOUDHURY, P ADHIKARI,G UDDIN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 05-05-2025 Mr. G. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty, to file afresh. Mr. N. Das, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 is present and has submitted that he has no objection to the said prayer. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant