THE TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. AMIR ALI AND 3 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/1429/2025 · 2025-09-07
Mitali Thakuria
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10905 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10905 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010080202025
2025:GAU-AS:12150
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1429/2025 THE TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT PENINSULA BUSINESS PARK, TOWER A, 15 FLOOR, G K MARG, LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI- 400013, MAHARASHTRA AND HAVING ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR, MAYUR GARDEN, OPP HDFC BANK, GS ROAD, GUWAHATI 781005, ASSAM VERSUS AMIR ALI AND 3 ORS S/O- LATE NURUL AMIN, R/O- BORBORI, P.O- BELTOLA, PS DHARAMTULI, PIN- 782412, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM 2:LAILA KHATUN W/O. MD. AMIR ALI R/O. BORBARI P/O. BELTALA P/S. DHARAMTULI PIN-782412 DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM. 3:ARUP DEWRI S/O. SRI PRAFULLA DEWRI R/O. AMARAGURI P/O. BHURAGAON P/S. BHURAGAON PIN-782127 DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM. 4:JATIN BASUMATARY S/O. D. BASUMATARY
Page No.# 2/3 C/O. PRAMOD BORO R/O. MURKATA P/O. DURUNG PAHAR P/S. KHETRI PIN-782403 DIST. KAMRUP (M0 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : A K BHATTACHARYYA, MS L SHARMA,MR. K K BHATRA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A R AGARWALA (R-1), MR ADITYA AGARWALA(R-1)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 08-09-2025
Heard Mr. K.K. Bhatta, the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A.R. Agarwala, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1/claimant in this case. 2. The case was identified for sending it for mediation. However, it is seen that the case is not yet registered for pendency of the application for condonation of delay of 160 days. 3. It is submitted by Mr. Bhatta that there is no intentional delay on the part of the appellant. However, for observation of some procedural formalities there is 160 days delay in preferring the appeal. 4. Mr. Agarwala, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that he has no objection if the delay is condoned and the appeal is registered. 5. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties and also perused the reason for delay mentioned in para nos. 5 to 8, which is basically due to observation of
Page No.# 3/3 some procedural formalities. 6. Considering the submissions and other aspects of the case, the delay of 160 days is hereby condoned. 7. The petition is accordingly allowed. 8.
Registry to register and number the connected appeal which is filed against the judgment and order passed by learned Member, MACT No. 2, Kamrup (M) in MAC Case No. 2119/2019 whereby the claimant was awarded with an amount of Rs. 22,75,106.30/- with 9% interest per annum. 9. Registry will do the needful in registering and numbering the connected appeal and is also hereby directed to reflect the name of the engaged counsel in the Cause List. List accordingly. The IA is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant