IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 226/1 GURMUKH SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J.(ORAL) 1. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 petitioner in case FIR No. 506, 148, 149 Lambi, District 2. FIR (Annexure P connection with the occurrence which took place between co deceased nor in the subsequent ambush, which allegedly took place following the first incident. be nominated as an accused on a later date, and that too, on account of local village politics. raised qua the involve IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64544 Date of decision: GURMUKH SINGH @ JASVEER SINGH @ Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. A.D.S. Jattana, Advocate and Mr. Mandeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab Assisted by SI Karanjit Kaur. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J.(ORAL) The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 petitioner in case FIR No.85 dated 05.06.2024 506, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 , District Sri Muktsar Sahib (Annexure P Learned counsel for the petitioner FIR (Annexure P-1) reveals that the petitioner has not been named either in with the occurrence which took place between co deceased nor in the subsequent ambush, which allegedly took place following the first incident. It has been contended that the petitioner came to be nominated as an accused on a later date, and that too, on account of local village politics. It has been argued that even otherwise, no suspicion was the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence in question, in IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 64544-2024 Date of decision: September 10, 2025 @ TEENA .....Petitioner .....Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL and Mandeep Singh Gill, Advocate Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of for grant of regular bail to the 05.06.2024 under Sections 302, 307, 452, Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station (Annexure P-1). he petitioner submits that a perusal of the 1) reveals that the petitioner has not been named either in with the occurrence which took place between co-accused and deceased nor in the subsequent ambush, which allegedly took place It has been contended that the petitioner came to be nominated as an accused on a later date, and that too, on account of local It has been argued that even otherwise, no suspicion was r in the occurrence in question, in Petitioner .....Respondent The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of for grant of regular bail to the 302, 307, 452, , registered at Police Station submits that a perusal of the 1) reveals that the petitioner has not been named either in accused and deceased nor in the subsequent ambush, which allegedly took place It has been contended that the petitioner came to be nominated as an accused on a later date, and that too, on account of local It has been argued that even otherwise, no suspicion was r in the occurrence in question, in Jaspreet Kaur 2025.09.10 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-64544 which one person namely Gurmeet Ram lost his life, while another person Manjit Ram also submitted that as per the challan presented, the only role attributed to the petitioner is of having consp crime in question. 3. 3. injury having been attributed to the petitioner either on the person of the deceased or even the injured Ma criminal antecedents, the petitioner deserves to be extended the concession of bail as he has now been in custody since prosecution witnesses have been cited examined. Henc does not arise. 4. for the complainant made by the counsel opposite. Learned not disputed the custody period of the petitioner nor has stage of trial. It has also not been disputed that the petitioner has not been attributed any injury, much less fatal, on the person of the deceas on injured Manjit Ram. However, it has been asserted by the learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant that there was a rivalry between the parties as they belonged to different political outfits. It was in that backdro 64544-2024 which one person namely Gurmeet Ram lost his life, while another person Manjit Ram was inflicted injuries by the co also submitted that as per the challan presented, the only role attributed to the petitioner is of having conspired with the co crime in question. Learned counsel has still further submitted that in view of no injury having been attributed to the petitioner either on the person of the deceased or even the injured Manjit Ram, and the criminal antecedents, the petitioner deserves to be extended the concession of bail as he has now been in custody since prosecution witnesses have been cited, till date, only one examined. Hence, the possibility of the trial concluding in the near future does not arise. Per contra, learned State counsel for the complainant, has vehemently opposed made by the counsel opposite. Learned State counsel, disputed the custody period of the petitioner nor has stage of trial. It has also not been disputed that the petitioner has not been attributed any injury, much less fatal, on the person of the deceas on injured Manjit Ram. However, it has been asserted by the learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant that there was a rivalry between the parties as they belonged to different political outfits. It was in that backdrop, all the accused carried out a premeditated attack -2- which one person namely Gurmeet Ram lost his life, while another person was inflicted injuries by the co-accused. Learned counsel has also submitted that as per the challan presented, the only role attributed to ired with the co-accused in carrying out the further submitted that in view of no injury having been attributed to the petitioner either on the person of the jit Ram, and the petitioner having no criminal antecedents, the petitioner deserves to be extended the concession of bail as he has now been in custody since 13.06.2024; as many as 28 till date, only one witness stands e, the possibility of the trial concluding in the near future , learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel has vehemently opposed the prayer and submissions State counsel, on instructions, has disputed the custody period of the petitioner nor has he disputed the stage of trial. It has also not been disputed that the petitioner has not been attributed any injury, much less fatal, on the person of the deceased or even on injured Manjit Ram. However, it has been asserted by the learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant that there was a rivalry between the parties as they belonged to different political outfits. It all the accused carried out a premeditated attack and which one person namely Gurmeet Ram lost his life, while another person accused. Learned counsel has also submitted that as per the challan presented, the only role attributed to accused in carrying out the further submitted that in view of no injury having been attributed to the petitioner either on the person of the petitioner having no criminal antecedents, the petitioner deserves to be extended the concession .06.2024; as many as 28 stands e, the possibility of the trial concluding in the near future assisted by learned counsel ns on instructions, has he disputed the stage of trial. It has also not been disputed that the petitioner has not been ed or even on injured Manjit Ram. However, it has been asserted by the learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant that there was a rivalry between the parties as they belonged to different political outfits. It Jaspreet Kaur 2025.09.10 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-64544 the petitioner actively conspired with the co support. 5. complainant have 1), which stands reproduced hereinunder: father, Gurmeet Ram, against allowing a Congress booth to be In response, they shot my father, Gurmeet Ram, in the left leg 64544-2024 the petitioner actively conspired with the co Learned State counsel as well as the learned counsel for the complainant have reiterated the allegations levelled in the FIR (Annexure P 1), which stands reproduced hereinunder:- “Statement Gurjant Singh, son of Gurmeet Ram and grandson of Tahla Ram, resides in the village of Kakhawali and is approximately 20 years old. His phone number is 76529 He reported that he works as a labourer, and on June 1, 2024, during the elections, the Congress party set up a booth in front of his uncle Manjit Ram's house. Harbans Ram, who is affiliated with the Aam Aadmi Party, advised my uncle and father, Gurmeet Ram, against allowing a Congress booth to be established near their home. The sarpa angered by this and stated that they did not remove the Congress booth despite his request. On June 4, 2024, at around 6:30 PM, I, my father Gurmeet Ram, and my uncle Manjit Ram were at my uncle's house when several individuals, includi Our village Sarpanch Dalip Ram S/o Harbans Ram with Gandassa, Malikit Ram son of Harbans Ram with Musla Sela, Boota Ram son of Hansa with Moosla Kahi Dasta, Sandeep Ram son of Malkit with Musla Danda, Sandeep Ram Son of Harbans Ram Musla Danda, Gagandee Ram with Musla Kirpan, Boota Ram son of Shankar Ram son of Baja Ram Musla Danda, Boota Ram son of Hansa Ram son of Fauja Ram Musla Danda, Harbans Singh son of Mal Singh Chaki Wala Musla Rod, Happy son of Satpal son of Amar Ram Musla Danda, residents of Kakhwali and others, entered the house armed with deadly weapons. Dilip Ram, the sarpanch, demanded to know where the Congress booth was being set up. In response, they shot my father, Gurmeet Ram, in the left leg and injured him in several other areas. When my uncle Manjit Ram tried to intervene to assist my father, Dilip Ram struck him on the back of the head with a dagger. The assailants then fled the scene. I contacted my uncle, Kashmir Ram (son of Doggar), to arrange for transportation. Along with Gursevak Singh (son of Manjit Ram), we took Gurmeet Ram for medical treatment. While we were transporting my father and uncle Manjit Ram to the government hospital in Lambhi, they were ambushed again near Lambhi village by Jasvir Singh @ Tin -3- the petitioner actively conspired with the co-accused by lending his passive as well as the learned counsel for the reiterated the allegations levelled in the FIR (Annexure P- Statement Gurjant Singh, son of Gurmeet Ram and grandson of Tahla Ram, resides in the village of Kakhawali and is approximately 20 years old. His phone number is 76529-60026. His phone number is 76529-60026. He reported that he works as a labourer, and on June 1, 2024, s, the Congress party set up a booth in front of his uncle Manjit Ram's house. Harbans Ram, who is affiliated with the Aam Aadmi Party, advised my uncle and father, Gurmeet Ram, against allowing a Congress booth to be established near their home. The sarpanch, Dalip Ram, was angered by this and stated that they did not remove the Congress booth despite his request. On June 4, 2024, at around 6:30 PM, I, my father Gurmeet Ram, and my uncle Manjit Ram were at my uncle's house when several individuals, including Our village Sarpanch Dalip Ram S/o Harbans Ram with Gandassa, Malikit Ram son of Harbans Ram with Musla Sela, Boota Ram son of Hansa with Moosla Kahi Dasta, Sandeep Ram son of Malkit with Musla Danda, Sandeep Ram Son of Harbans Ram Musla Danda, Gagandeep Ram son of Kashmiri Ram with Musla Kirpan, Boota Ram son of Shankar Ram son of Baja Ram Musla Danda, Boota Ram son of Hansa Ram son of Fauja Ram Musla Danda, Harbans Singh son of Mal Singh Chaki Wala Musla Rod, Happy son of Satpal son of Amar Ram anda, residents of Kakhwali and others, entered the house armed with deadly weapons. Dilip Ram, the sarpanch, demanded to know where the Congress booth was being set up. In response, they shot my father, Gurmeet Ram, in the left leg ral other areas. When my uncle Manjit Ram tried to intervene to assist my father, Dilip Ram struck him on the back of the head with a dagger. The assailants then fled the scene. I contacted my uncle, Kashmir Ram (son of Doggar), on. Along with Gursevak Singh (son of Manjit Ram), we took Gurmeet Ram for medical treatment. While we were transporting my father and uncle Manjit Ram to the government hospital in Lambhi, they were ambushed again near Lambhi village by Jasvir Singh @ Tina (son of Bodha accused by lending his passive as well as the learned counsel for the - Statement Gurjant Singh, son of Gurmeet Ram and grandson of Tahla Ram, resides in the village of Kakhawali and is 60026. He reported that he works as a labourer, and on June 1, 2024, s, the Congress party set up a booth in front of his uncle Manjit Ram's house. Harbans Ram, who is affiliated with the Aam Aadmi Party, advised my uncle and father, Gurmeet Ram, against allowing a Congress booth to be nch, Dalip Ram, was angered by this and stated that they did not remove the Congress booth despite his request. On June 4, 2024, at around 6:30 PM, I, my father Gurmeet Ram, and my uncle Manjit Ram ng Our village Sarpanch Dalip Ram S/o Harbans Ram with Gandassa, Malikit Ram son of Harbans Ram with Musla Sela, Boota Ram son of Hansa with Moosla Kahi Dasta, Sandeep Ram son of Malkit with Musla Danda, Sandeep Ram Son of p Ram son of Kashmiri Ram with Musla Kirpan, Boota Ram son of Shankar Ram son of Baja Ram Musla Danda, Boota Ram son of Hansa Ram son of Fauja Ram Musla Danda, Harbans Singh son of Mal Singh Chaki Wala Musla Rod, Happy son of Satpal son of Amar Ram anda, residents of Kakhwali and others, entered the house armed with deadly weapons. Dilip Ram, the sarpanch, demanded to know where the Congress booth was being set up. In response, they shot my father, Gurmeet Ram, in the left leg ral other areas. When my uncle Manjit Ram tried to intervene to assist my father, Dilip Ram struck him on the back of the head with a dagger. The assailants then fled the scene. I contacted my uncle, Kashmir Ram (son of Doggar), on. Along with Gursevak Singh (son of Manjit Ram), we took Gurmeet Ram for medical treatment. While we were transporting my father and uncle Manjit Ram to the government hospital in Lambhi, they were ambushed again Jaspreet Kaur 2025.09.10 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-64544 present, my father is deceased, and my uncle Manjit Ram Including other men and Gurpinder Singh son of Surjit Singh 64544-2024 Singh), Harspinder Singh (son of Hardeep Singh), Ramesh Kumar (son of Mangha Ram), and Amritpal Singh (son of Swaran Singh), who attacked them once more. After this second attack, Gursevak Singh admitted Gurmeet Ram and Manjit Ram to the government hospital in Lambhi. Due to lots of injuries doctor refer both of them to Bathinda Government Hospital. Unfortunately, my father, Gurmeet Ram, passed away that night due to the injuries he sustained. My uncle Manjit Ram was admitted to the Neuro Centre in Bathinda incident, several assailants had entered my uncle Manjit Ram's house with the intent to kill both my father and my uncle. At present, my father is deceased, and my uncle Manjit Ram remains hospitalized. Legal action should be taken agai the assailants mentioned. Gurpinder Singh Surjit Singh Resident of Kampwali Phone 97801 Baljit Singh Sl, Chief Officer RG Jana Killianwali, Date 5 2024, Action Police:- Today, RG Pana Killianwali received notification from the police station Lambi that Gurmeet Ram son of Tehila Ram and Manjit Ram son of Tehila Ram residents of Kakhawali are admitted to Government Hospital Lambi due to injuries SI/SHO For the action of fellow employees, CH Lambi arrived first Police Station BS/BB/Lambi/2024 Gurmeet Singh son of Tehila Ram and MLR no. BS/89/Lambi/2024 Manjit Ram, son of Tehila Ram Vasian, reached Government Hospital Lambi after obtaining Takhwali. Dr. Obtained a written opinion from the Sahib to take the statements of both. Dr Sahib wrote about referring the both to CH Bathinda for treatment and then received a telephone notification from DCR Bathinda that Gurmeet Ram, son of Tahila Ram, resident of Kukhawali, due to serious injuries has been dead. His body were lyi Bathinda on which SI/SHO along with ASI Baj Singh no. 412/SMS, C-1 Ranveer Singh 567, Sct Buta Singh No. 908.C1 Gurbhag Singh No. 657 Bajawadi government vehicle Bolero No. PB-65BF-2052 whose driver Ct Sudesh Kumar 396 DCR Bathinda at stop number 2412/DCR/BTI dated 5.6.24 reached the Government Hospital Bathinda in the hospital Mudai Gurjant Singh son of Gurmeet Ram resident of Kakhawali Including other men and Gurpinder Singh son of Surjit Singh resident Kukhwanwali was found who g down to me, which was read out word by word, who after listening to his statement accepted it as correct and signed in Punjabi under his statement. With a verified statement, MLRs have been examined, and all cases of diarrhoea are offences under 302,307,452.506,148,149 IPC. Therefore, the -4- Singh), Harspinder Singh (son of Hardeep Singh), Ramesh Kumar (son of Mangha Ram), and Amritpal Singh (son of Swaran Singh), who attacked them once more. After this second attack, Gursevak Singh admitted Gurmeet Ram and Manjit Ram l in Lambhi. Due to lots of injuries doctor refer both of them to Bathinda Government Hospital. Unfortunately, my father, Gurmeet Ram, passed away that night due to the injuries he sustained. My uncle Manjit Ram was admitted to the Neuro Centre in Bathinda. On the day of the incident, several assailants had entered my uncle Manjit Ram's house with the intent to kill both my father and my uncle. At present, my father is deceased, and my uncle Manjit Ram remains hospitalized. Legal action should be taken against all the assailants mentioned. Gurpinder Singh Surjit Singh Resident of Kampwali Phone 97801-51953, Verification SD/- Baljit Singh Sl, Chief Officer RG Jana Killianwali, Date 5-6- Today, RG Pana Killianwali received m the police station Lambi that Gurmeet Ram son of Tehila Ram and Manjit Ram son of Tehila Ram residents of Kakhawali are admitted to Government Hospital Lambi due to injuries SI/SHO For the action of fellow employees, CH Lambi arrived first Police Station to MLR no. BS/BB/Lambi/2024 Gurmeet Singh son of Tehila Ram and MLR no. BS/89/Lambi/2024 Manjit Ram, son of Tehila Ram Vasian, reached Government Hospital Lambi after obtaining Takhwali. Dr. Obtained a written opinion from the Sahib to take the of both. Dr Sahib wrote about referring the both to CH Bathinda for treatment and then received a telephone notification from DCR Bathinda that Gurmeet Ram, son of Tahila Ram, resident of Kukhawali, due to serious injuries has been dead. His body were lying in the Morchary of CH Bathinda on which SI/SHO along with ASI Baj Singh no. 1 Ranveer Singh 567, Sct Buta Singh No. 908.C1 Gurbhag Singh No. 657 Bajawadi government vehicle Bolero 2052 whose driver Ct Sudesh Kumar 396 DCR at stop number 2412/DCR/BTI dated 5.6.24 reached the Government Hospital Bathinda in the hospital Mudai Gurjant Singh son of Gurmeet Ram resident of Kakhawali Including other men and Gurpinder Singh son of Surjit Singh resident Kukhwanwali was found who got his statement written down to me, which was read out word by word, who after listening to his statement accepted it as correct and signed in Punjabi under his statement. With a verified statement, MLRs have been examined, and all cases of diarrhoea are found to be offences under 302,307,452.506,148,149 IPC. Therefore, the Singh), Harspinder Singh (son of Hardeep Singh), Ramesh Kumar (son of Mangha Ram), and Amritpal Singh (son of Swaran Singh), who attacked them once more. After this second attack, Gursevak Singh admitted Gurmeet Ram and Manjit Ram l in Lambhi. Due to lots of injuries doctor refer both of them to Bathinda Government Hospital. Unfortunately, my father, Gurmeet Ram, passed away that night due to the injuries he sustained. My uncle Manjit Ram was . On the day of the incident, several assailants had entered my uncle Manjit Ram's house with the intent to kill both my father and my uncle. At present, my father is deceased, and my uncle Manjit Ram nst all the assailants mentioned. Gurpinder Singh Surjit Singh - - Today, RG Pana Killianwali received m the police station Lambi that Gurmeet Ram son of Tehila Ram and Manjit Ram son of Tehila Ram residents of Kakhawali are admitted to Government Hospital Lambi due to injuries SI/SHO For the action of fellow employees, CH to MLR no. BS/BB/Lambi/2024 Gurmeet Singh son of Tehila Ram and MLR no. BS/89/Lambi/2024 Manjit Ram, son of Tehila Ram Vasian, reached Government Hospital Lambi after obtaining Takhwali. Dr. Obtained a written opinion from the Sahib to take the of both. Dr Sahib wrote about referring the both to CH Bathinda for treatment and then received a telephone notification from DCR Bathinda that Gurmeet Ram, son of Tahila Ram, resident of Kukhawali, due to serious injuries has ng in the Morchary of CH Bathinda on which SI/SHO along with ASI Baj Singh no. 1 Ranveer Singh 567, Sct Buta Singh No. 908.C1 Gurbhag Singh No. 657 Bajawadi government vehicle Bolero 2052 whose driver Ct Sudesh Kumar 396 DCR at stop number 2412/DCR/BTI dated 5.6.24 reached the Government Hospital Bathinda in the hospital Mudai Gurjant Singh son of Gurmeet Ram resident of Kakhawali Including other men and Gurpinder Singh son of Surjit Singh ot his statement written down to me, which was read out word by word, who after listening to his statement accepted it as correct and signed in Punjabi under his statement. With a verified statement, MLRs found to be Jaspreet Kaur 2025.09.10 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-64544 6. submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has clean antecedents. In support, learned State counsel has placed on record the custody certificate of the petitioner, which is taken on record subjec just exceptions. As per the custody certificate, one case under the Arms Act stands registered against the petitioner. 7. record a copy of the order dated 15.10.2024 passed by this Court i CRM-M-8947 stands quashed 8. relevant material placed on record. 9. possibility of the trial concluding in the near future seems remote in view of the fact that as on date, only 64544-2024 statement is recorded against the said accused Dalip Kumar, Malkit Ram, Buta Ram Sandeep Ram Gagandeep Ram, Sandeep Ram, Buta Ram, Harbans Singh, Buta Ram Happy resident of Kakhanwali and Jasvir Singh, Harshpinder Singh, Ramesh Kumar, Amritpal Singh resident Panjawa. HC Buta Singh No. 908 is sent to Lambi police station and the case number should be registered and informed about the case number. SD/-Baljit Singh SI, SHO RG Police Station Kakhanwali, Date 5-6-2024, Today CH Bathinda 01.15 PM Today Police Station:- Statement being registe responsible police station, the said case, the said crime, the original statement by registering the statement of accused. Duplicate FIR Manual Arrival S/C is being sent to Area Magistrate and Officers are being notified. Learned State counsel has, however, controverted the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has clean antecedents. In support, learned State counsel has placed on record the custody certificate of the petitioner, which is taken on record subjec just exceptions. As per the custody certificate, one case under the Arms Act stands registered against the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a copy of the order dated 15.10.2024 passed by this Court i 8947-2024, wherein it stands reflected that the said FIR already stands quashed qua the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the relevant material placed on record. The petitioner has been in custody s possibility of the trial concluding in the near future seems remote in view of the fact that as on date, only 1 witness stands -5- the said accused Dalip Kumar, Malkit Ram, Buta Ram Sandeep Ram Gagandeep Ram, Sandeep Ram, Buta Ram, Harbans Singh, Buta Ram Happy resident of Kakhanwali and Jasvir Singh, Harshpinder Singh, Ramesh Kumar, Amritpal Singh resident Panjawa. HC Buta 908 is sent to Lambi police station and the case number should be registered and informed about the case Baljit Singh SI, SHO RG Police Station 2024, Today CH Bathinda 01.15 PM Statement being registered in the said responsible police station, the said case, the said crime, the original statement by registering the statement of accused. Duplicate FIR Manual Arrival S/C is being sent to Area Magistrate and Officers are being notified.” e counsel has, however, controverted the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has clean antecedents. In support, learned State counsel has placed on record the custody certificate of the petitioner, which is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. As per the custody certificate, one case under the Arms Act However, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a copy of the order dated 15.10.2024 passed by this Court in 2024, wherein it stands reflected that the said FIR already I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the The petitioner has been in custody since 13.06.2024. The possibility of the trial concluding in the near future seems remote in view of s examined out of the 28 cited the said accused Dalip Kumar, Malkit Ram, Buta Ram Sandeep Ram Gagandeep Ram, Sandeep Ram, Buta Ram, Harbans Singh, Buta Ram Happy resident of Kakhanwali and Jasvir Singh, Harshpinder Singh, Ramesh Kumar, Amritpal Singh resident Panjawa. HC Buta 908 is sent to Lambi police station and the case number should be registered and informed about the case Baljit Singh SI, SHO RG Police Station 2024, Today CH Bathinda 01.15 PM red in the said responsible police station, the said case, the said crime, the original statement by registering the statement of accused. Duplicate FIR Manual Arrival S/C is being sent to Area e counsel has, however, controverted the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has clean antecedents. In support, learned State counsel has placed on record the t to all just exceptions. As per the custody certificate, one case under the Arms Act However, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on n 2024, wherein it stands reflected that the said FIR already I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the . The possibility of the trial concluding in the near future seems remote in view of Jaspreet Kaur 2025.09.10 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-64544 by the prosecution. has been attributed to the petitioner, this Court deems it fit to admit the petitioner to bail. 10. be admitted to bail on his furnishing bail/surety the Trial Court/Duty 11. shall not be construed to be an expression of op case. 12. the concession of bail, the State would be at liberty to approach this Court to seek cancellation of bail t September 10 Jaspreet Kaur 64544-2024 by the prosecution. Further, keeping in view that no injury, much less fatal, has been attributed to the petitioner, this Court deems it fit to admit the petitioner to bail. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed be admitted to bail on his furnishing bail/surety Court/Duty Magistrate concerned. However, it is made clear that anything observed hereinabove shall not be construed to be an expression of op Needless to add here, in case the petitioner is found misusing the concession of bail, the State would be at liberty to approach this Court to seek cancellation of bail to him. September 10, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -6- keeping in view that no injury, much less fatal, has been attributed to the petitioner, this Court deems it fit to admit the Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed, and the petitioner be admitted to bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of However, it is made clear that anything observed hereinabove shall not be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the Needless to add here, in case the petitioner is found misusing the concession of bail, the State would be at liberty to approach this Court to (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No keeping in view that no injury, much less fatal, has been attributed to the petitioner, this Court deems it fit to admit the and the petitioner of However, it is made clear that anything observed hereinabove inion on the merits of the Needless to add here, in case the petitioner is found misusing the concession of bail, the State would be at liberty to approach this Court to Jaspreet Kaur 2025.09.10 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh