SMT ROLI PANDEY AND 2 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/39765/2024 · 2025-05-13
Manish Kumar Nigam
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 109040 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 109040 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:79580 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39765 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt Roli Pandey And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Dubey,Ravi Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-
"Issue an order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the respondents authorities to consider the grievance of petitioners and to decide the representation filed before Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Soraon, Prayagraj and take action. against the respondent no.4 and his other associates as per Section 227 of U.P. Revenue Code 2016" 3.Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that after the demarcation, boundary pillars were installed. The same have been destroyed by the respondents.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the petitioner may move an application under Section 22 read with Section 23 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner move an application under Section 22 read with Section 23 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. In case, such an application is moved within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the concerned court within next twelve weeks after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, provided there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 14.5.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad