Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10904 (AP)

Smt. D.Lakshmi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7171/2018 · 2025-07-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010124972018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7171/2018 Between: 1. SMT. D.LAKSHMI, W/O. LATE D.K. PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC.HOUSEWIFE, R/O. H.NO.1-143A, 1ST WARD, SITAIJALANKA, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 521 121. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE CORRESPONDENT, CBM BOARDING UPPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MANDAL PARISHAD, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. N AHARON RAJU, S/O. SAMUEL, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC.SGT, CBM BOARDING UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Certiorari 2 calling for all connected records and declare the proceedings Rc.No.56/R1/2014 dt. 29.4.2015 and 29.12.2015 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and further direct the 2nd Respondent to pay leave encashment and difference of pay to the Petitioner forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant the leave encashment and pay difference that my husband was entitled to during his service as School Assistant forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition and other pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K. KIRAN MAYEE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) 2. 00422 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7171/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Certiorari calling for all connected records and declare the proceedings Rc.No.56/R1/2014 dt. 29.4.2015 and 29.12.2015 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and further direct the 2nd Respondent to pay leave encashment and difference of pay to the Petitioner forthwith and pass…” 2. None represented on behalf of the Petitioner. The Proceeding Sheet dated 04.07.2025, also shows that none represented for the Petitioner. The Matter is directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Despite the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” in the list today, none represented the matter. It appears they have no interest in prosecuting the matter. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to Costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.07.2025 UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7171 of 2018 Dated.10.07.2025 UPS 69