1 2025:CGHC:14314 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 66 of 2025 1 - Satish Yadav S/o Late Mr. Kanhaiya Lal Yadav Aged About 45 Years By Caste Rawat, R/o Subhash Ward, Kanker, Post- Kanker, Tahsil- Kanker, Distt.- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner Land Records State of Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, 1st Floor Block - 2, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Land Records State Of Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - High Level Investigation Committee Through Shri K.D. Kunjam, Special Secretary, Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Girdhar Gopal Rathor S/o Jethuram Rathor Aged About 34 Years R/o D.M. -75, P.S. Ompur Colony Rajgmar, Korba Tahsil- Korba, District - Korba, Chhattisgarh, (Petitioner) 6 - Vikash Kumar Jaiswal S/o Dwarika Prasad Jaiswal Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Parsada, Tehsil Pali, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh, (Petitioner) 7 - Bhupendra Navrang S/o D.K. Navrang Aged About 33 Years R/o Mother Teresa Ward No. 10, Jarhabhata, Tehsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, (Petitioner) 8 - Ravindra Das Mahant S/o Nigam Das Mahant Aged About 34 Years R/o Sichai Colony, Barpali, Tehsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh, (Petitioner) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate For State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Government Advocate For Respondents No.5 to 8 : Shri Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.04.07 20:03:30 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25/03/2025 1. The instant is a petition filed for review of the order dated 14.1.2025 passed by this Court in WPS No.7889 of 2024. The review petitioner has made following prayer in the instant review petition: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be review the order dated 14/1/25 passed in the Writ Petition S No. 7889/24 and further please to direct the respondents to complete the investigation within specific time, and further please to grant an opportunity to the petitioner to submit the return in the writ petition, in the interest of justice. That Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. I have gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. 3. A review of an order is for removal of error, if any. Vide the instant review petition, no error has been pointed out in the final order passed in the writ petition. Instead, review of the final order has been sought on merits of the case. 4. I do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of the order dated 14.1.2025 passed by this Court in WPS No.7889 of 2024. 5. For the reasons aforestated, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh