FATIMA BEGUM MAZUMDAR @ FATIMA MAZUMDAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/2347/2020 · 2025-06-01
Arun Dev Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10901 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10901 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010080002020
2025:GAU-AS:7117
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2347/2020 FATIMA BEGUM MAZUMDAR @ FATIMA MAZUMDAR W/O- LT. ABDUL BASIT MAZUMDAR, R/O- KANAKPUR PART-I, P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS THROUGH- THE SECY., TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-06 2:THE DIRECTOR TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ASSAM DISPUR GHY-06 3:THE DY. DIRECTOR TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DISTRICT OFFICE SILCHAR P.O. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 4:THE CHAIRMAN SILCHAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001
Page No.# 2/3 5:MUSTT RINA BEGUM MAZUMDAR W/O- LT. AZMAL HUSSAIN MAZUMDAR R/O- KANAKPUR PART-I P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 6:MOIN UDDIN MAZUMDAR S/O- LT. MASADDAR ALI MAZUMDAR R/O- KANAKPUR PART-I P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 7:THE SECRETARY KANAKPUR GAON PANCHAYAT KANAKPUR P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 78800 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. JUNM LASKAR, MS. A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. S P CHOUDHURY (R-4),MR K BISWAKARMA,MR. S BISWAS (R-4),MR. P BORAH
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 02-06-2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. In terms of the Lawazima Court’s orders dated 09.12.2021, dated 28.05.2024 & dated 04.02.2025, none did appear for the petitioner before it. Perused the Lawazima Court’s order dated 21.05.2025, which goes to show that the petitioner has not taken any steps since January, 2025 for service of notices upon the respondent Nos. 5 & 7 in their
Page No.# 3/3 proper addresses by registered post with A/D as well as by usual Court process. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution and for want of steps, the interim order passed earlier is hereby vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant