Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109002 (ALL)

AMIT AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/41173/2024 · 2025-03-02

Raj Beer Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:29778 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41173 of 2024 Applicant :- Amit And 8 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Babu Vaish Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings, including summoning order dated 10.09.2024, of Complaint Case No. 453 of 2023 (Ravi Prakash Vs. Amit & others), arising out of Case Crime No.94 of 2017, under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Khair, District Aligarh, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Khair, Aligarh, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the alleged dispute between the parties has taken place due to misconception and that now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the complainant of the case and injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. In the alleged incident no one has sustained any serious injury. Both the parties belong to the same locality. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court concerned, has already been verified by the court concerned, copy of which is on record. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise. In the instant case, the matter relates to private dispute between the parties. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. Both the parties are residents of same locality. There is nothing to indicate that parties have any criminal antecedents. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. Considering facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 7. In view of the aforesaid, entire impugned proceedings, including summoning order, of the aforesaid case, against applicants, namely, Amit, Ravi Chaudhary, Rajat Chaudhary, Suresh, Chintu @ Devendra, Radhey Shyam, Vijay Pal, Veerpal & Pawan @ Anurag Chaudhary are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 'SP'/- Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad