Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129624 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43719 of 2024 Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Durga Prasad Singh,Santosh Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ankit Kumar Mishra,G.A.,Vikrant Pratap Singh,Vinanjay Kumar Patel Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the allegation against the applicant is that he had collected money and has not paid to the informant. Learned counsel submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the applicant is an employee of the informant and due to dispute on petty issue, the applicant has been roped in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that no such amount has been received by the applicant and there is nothing on record to demonstrate that the applicant has collected the money from the party. He thus submits that no offence against the applicant is made out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 27.10.2024, having no criminal history. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence. 4. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of evidence, and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Hence the bail application is allowed. 5. Let applicant Sandeep Kumar involved in Case Crime No.267 of 2024 under Sections 316(5), 318(4) B.N.S., Police Station Kotwali, District Gorakhpur, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:- A. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial. B. The applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. C. The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. D. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is an accused, or suspected, of the commission of he is suspected. E. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 6. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant in accordance with law. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 S.Ali Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad