Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 108941 (ALL)

NARAYAN @ NARAYAN DAS AND 8 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIB/4514/2024 · 2025-02-26

J J Munir

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:27093 Court No. - 49 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 4514 of 2024 Petitioner :- Narayan @ Narayan Das And 8 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J. The petitioners who are 9 in number and natives of village Sitaura, Post Bhandanwara, district Jhansi have represented their cause to the Consolidation Commissioner, Lucknow, U.P. asking a notification under Section 4-A(2) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 initiating the second round of consolidation operations to be cancelled. The ground on which the petitioners have represented to the Consolidation Commissioner are quoted below: "1. हम ललोगलो कके गग्राम ककी प्रथम चक ककी चकबन्ददी हलो गयदी हहै जजिसमम सभदी चकलो कलो चकरलोड व नग्रालदी दके ददी गयदी हहै अब इनककी कलोई आवश्यकतग्रा नहहीं हहै। 2. प्रथम चक ककी चकबन्ददी मम गग्राम कके सग्रावरजिननक उपयलोनगतग्रा ककी भभूनम जिहैसके स्कभू ल पग्राकर , खग्राद कके गडढके आनद कके जलए पयग्रारप्त भभूनम उपलब्ध हहै सग्रावरजिननक प्रयलोग हकेततु नकसदी भदी भभूनम ककी आवश्यकतग्रा नहहीं हहै 3. गग्राम ककी भभूनम अत्यजधक ककीमतदी हहै सभदी छलोटके बडके कक षक हहै छलोटदी जिलोत कके सभदी कक षक हहै हम ललोग अपनदी भभूनम ककी कटटौतदी नहहीं करग्रानग्रा चग्राहतके हहै। 4. गग्राम मम चकबन्ददी हलोनके सके गग्राम कके कक षककों मम आपसदी नववग्राद बढकेगके जजिसमम झगडके हलोनके ककी ससंभग्रावनग्रा हहै जजिससके गग्राम मम सग्रामग्राजजिक सटौहग्रादर नवगडनके ककी सम्भग्रावनग्रा हहै।" Now, it is difficult to hold that the petitioners, who are 9 natives of village Sitaura, Post Bhandanwara, district Jhansi, are entitled to say that the second round of consolidation operations be cancelled for the entire village. They hardly have a justiciable right to ask for cancellation of a notification under Section 4-A(2) of the Act. The controversy about their right to question the notification which is issued in exercise of the legislative power of the State, stands concluded against them in terms of the Bench decision of this Court in Agricultural & Industrial Syndicate Limited vs. State of U.P., 1975 SCC OnLine All 521, followed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Raja Ram Ojha vs. Consolidation Commissioner, U.P, Lucknow, 2014 SCC OnLine All 15410 and in a later Bench decision in Vishvadev vs. Director of Consolidation and others, Neutral Citation No. 2016:AHC:182608-DB. This petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, it is dismissed as not maintainable. Order Date :- 27.2.2025 Brijesh Maurya Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad