VIVEK KUJUR v. BIHAR STATE HYDRO ELECTRICAL CORPORATION LTD.
WPC/1822/2025 · 2025-04-24
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10889 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10889 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:12228 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 1822 of 2025
---- Vivek Kujur, aged about 32 years, son of late Prabhat Kujur, resident of village-Karanji, Joratoli, P.O. & P.S. Bero, Dist. Ranchi.
..........Petitioner Versus
1. Bihar State Hydro Electrical Corporation Ltd., ‘Sone Bhawan’, Bir Chandra Patel Marg, Patna, P.O. & P.S. Patna, Dist. Patna (Bihar), PIN-800001.
2. Managing Director, Bihar State Hydro Electrical Corporation Ltd., ‘Sone Bhawan’, Bir Chandra Patel Marg, Patna, P.O. & P.S. Patna, Dist. Patna (Bihar), PIN-800001.
3. Assistant Engineer, Hydro Electrical Project, Chandil, P.O. & P.S. Chandil, Dist. Seraikella-Kharsawan.
.........Respondents
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents :
---- 03/24.04.2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the Petitioner praying for a direction upon the Respondent-authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground in view of the fact that father of the petitioner, who was in service under Bihar State Hydro Electrical Corporation Ltd. died on 13.01.2017 while he was in service.
2.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that though Petitioner had applied for compassionate appointment in time but the Respondents are sitting tight over the matter. He fairly submits that since it is a matter of compassionate appointment; as such, instead of issuing notice to the Respondents, they may be directed to consider the case of the Petitioner.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and looking to the averments made in this writ application; the instant writ application is hereby disposed of; without going into the merits of the case, by directing the 2nd Respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision with regard to the grievance of this petitioner in accordance with law and applicable
2025:JHHC:12228 2
Rules and Regulations. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve copy of this writ application to the 2nd respondent at the earliest for convenience.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Kunal