Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010079712025 2025:GAU-AS:4893-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/364/2025 RIMLY GOGOI SAIKIA D/O- MR. KHAGEN GOGOI, R/O- BIRINASAYEK, GARIKURI VILLAGE, TITABAR-785630. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006. 2:MOHANLAL MEENA THE THEN SUPERINTENDENTOF POLICE JORHAT THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT ATILAGAON JORHAT- 7B5OO1 3:KAKOLI PATGIRI SUB.DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER TITABAR JORHAT- 785630 4:LAKSHMAN KUMAR DAS OFFICER-IN.CHARGE TITABAR POLICE STATION TITABAR JORHAT 785630 5:MIRAJ DOLEY CASE INVESTIGATING OFFICER (TITABAR PS CASE NO. 13212023) TITABAR POLICE STATION TITABAR JORHAT- 785630 Page No.# 2/4 6:DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI 7BTOO7 7:SUPERITENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT ATHAGAON JORHAT- 785OO Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. ARIF JWADDER, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Linked Case : W.P.(Crl.)/11/2025 RIMLY GOGOI SAIKIA D/O- MR. KHAGEN GOGOI R/O- BIRINASAYEK GARIKURI VILLAGE TITABAR-785630. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS THROUGH HOME SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 2:MOHANLAL MEENA THE THEN SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ATILAGAON JORHAT-785001. 3:KAKOLI PATGIRI SUB-DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER TITABAR JORHAT-785630. Page No.# 3/4 4:LAKSHMAN KUMAR DAS OFFICER-IN-CHARGE TITABAR POLICE STATION TITABAR JORHAT-785630. 5:MIRAJ DOLEY CASE INVESTIGATING OFFICER (TITABAR PS CASE NO. 132/2023) TITABAR POLICE STATION TITABAR JORHAT-785630. ------------ Advocate for : MR. ARIF JWADDER Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI ORDER Date : 23.04.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. A. Jwadder, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Govt. Advocate appearing for the opposite party nos.1, 6 and 7. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed for impleading the opposite party nos.6 and 7 as respondent nos.6 and 7 in the connected WP(Crl.) No. 11/2025. 3. Although the learned Senior Govt. Advocate has raised an objection to the prayer for impleadment, considering the order dated 02.04.2025, passed in the connected writ petition, this interlocutory application stands allowed and the Page No.# 4/4 opposite party nos.6 and 7 are allowed to be impleaded as respondent nos.6 and 7 in the connected WP(Crl.) No. 11/2025. 4. This interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant