Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 108886 (ALL)

VIKAS PANDEY AND 3 OTHERS v. State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/22110/2024 · 2025-01-16

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Nand Prabha Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:7459-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22110 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vikas Pandey And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Pandey,Subhash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- Aditaya Kumar Kashyap,G.A.,Manish Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. 1. Learned A.G.A. filed a short counter affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A for the State respondents. 3. Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the FIR dated 19.10.2024 lodged as Case Crime No.0368 of 2024, under Sections 58, 115(2), 351(2), 123 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023 & Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, P.S. Ghoorpur, District Allahabad and for a direction to respondents not to arrest the petitioner pursuant to aforesaid FIR. 4. Learned AGA, on the basis of counter affidavit, states that in the present matter final report has already been forwarded to the competent court. 5. In view of above, we are not inclined to proceed further in the matter. Needless to say, in case the petitioner is aggrieved, he may avail the remedy as available in law. 6. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 16.1.2025 Monika Digitally signed by :- MONIKA KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad