M/S IMRAN RAZA RICE MILLS VILL JANU NAGAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/39785/2024 · 2025-10-08
Neeraj Tiwari, Vivek Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 108883 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 108883 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39785 of 2024 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3 and Mohd Naushad, learned counsel for the respondent no. 6. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:-
"(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 4 & 5 to release the payment of account of the petitioner's firm i.e. A/C no.03690210001547 (UCO Bank) as per the approval order dated 6.3.2020 and order dated 13.10.2020 passed by respondent no.3 alongwith interest. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 30.1.2021 pending before the respondent no.5, National Cooperative Consumers Federation of India Limited Noida, B-4 Sector I, Gautam Budh Naar within stipulated period."
3. Mohd Naushad, learned counsel for the respondent no. 6 has raised objection and submitted that as on date nothing is due against the petitioner whereas bonafide amount has already been received by the respondent no.6, which is disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that suitable direction may be issued to decide the representation of petitioner dated 30.1.2021 within stipulated period. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Najakat Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Dr. Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui, Pranjal Mehrotra, Saiyad Iqbal Ahmed M/S Imran Raza Rice Mills Vill Janu Nagar .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India submitted that representation of the petitioner shall be considered and decided at the earliest. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.5 to decide the representation of petitioner dated 30.1.2021 within a period of two months from the production of certified copy of this order after providing opportunity of hearing and rebuttal to respondent no.6 also. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No.5 to decide the representation after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case.
October 9, 2025 Junaid WRIC No. 39785 of 2024 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad