[2025:RJ-JP:30533] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4873/2002 Abdul Jalil S/o Abdul Aziz, aged 47 years, R/o Kishorepura, Kota (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Director, Local Self Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Nagar Nigam Kota through The Chief Executive Officer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 07/08/2025 1. None present for the petitioner even in the second round. 2. It would reveal by pursuing the prayer made in the writ petition that direction has been sought by the petitioner against the respondents to grant benefit of fixation of pay scale of permanent employee, benefit of allowances and other service benefits to the petitioner w.e.f. 05.01.1977 which was alleged to be the date of his initial appointment. 3. In order to press his relief, the petitioner has relied upon bipartite conciliation proceedings dated 13.07.1999 as well as award dated 18.03.1987 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Kota, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:30533] (2 of 2) [CW-4873/2002] 4. Reply to the writ petition was filed on behalf of respondents, in which it has been mentioned that the petitioner has been trying to mislead this Court by way of misinterpreting the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal in case No. 40/1979. It was mentioned that against the aforesaid award in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3481/1988 was filed before this Court, which was decided on 20.11.1991. Thereafter, in order to seek clarification, one S.B. Civil Review Petition No. 163/1994 was filed by the Municipal Council, Kota, in which directions were given by this Court to clarify the eligibility of the workman in order to seek regularization or other benefits pursuant to the aforesaid award. 5. It has further been submitted in the reply that the interpretation of award and final verdict of this Court makes it clear that the regularization of the employees shall be done subject to availability of post to be sanctioned by Director Local Bodies. It was submitted that the petitioner shall not be entitled for the benefits as claimed by him. It has been clarified that the petitioner was regularized/made permanent in the year 1980 and was not entitled for the benefits pursuant to award dated 18.03.1987. 6. No rejoinder to the reply has been filed on behalf of petitioner to controvert the contents of the reply. 7. In view of above, I do not find any ground to interfere in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/20