Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 108822 (ALL)

SAROJ KUMARI v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/40105/2024 · 2025-03-18

Kshitij Shailendra, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39326-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40105 of 2024 Petitioner :- Saroj Kumari Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhaskar Bhadra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Shri Mukesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no.2 and 3. 2. The present petition has been filed claiming following reliefs:- "(i) to issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.3 to provide electricity connection on the name of petitioner as has already applied by the petitioner. (ii) to issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.3 to decide the representation of petitioner dated 13.08.2024." 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon the petitioner to file a fresh representation. If such a representation is filed, the Executing Engineer, being the respondent no.3, is directed to provide opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other relevant persons and, thereafter, pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 AKShukla/- (Kshitij Shailendra, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad