Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10877 (AP)

BADHULA SRIDHAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6604/2025 · 2025-08-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010124632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6604/2025 Between: 1. BADHULA SRIDHAR, S/O BADHULA PEDHA KANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O 15-116H, SAIBABA PETA, NANDIKOTKUR, NANDYAL DISTRICT- 518401. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NTR DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, COMMISSIONERATE, NTR DISTRICT. 6. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, AJITH SINGH NAGAR, NTR COMMISSIONERATE, NTR DISTRICT. 7. NAMISHETTI VENKAT, S/O.RAMUIU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.F-212, VIGNESH TOWERS, FIRST FLOOR, KUNDAVARI KHANDRIKA, NUNNA MAIN ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT- 520015. 8. MOHANA MURALIDHARA SESHAGIRI RAO, S/O. VENKATA RAMA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, O/O.DISTRICT SPORTS DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KAKMADA, R/O.3-247, SRINIVASA NAGAR, VINAYAKA TEMPLE, VAKALPUDI, KAKINADA RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT-533001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring i inaction of the Respondent Nos2 to 6 in conducting investigation and filing charge sheet/final report in Crime in FIR No.230 of 2023 dated 05.04.2023 on the file of the Ajth Singh Nagar Police Station NTR Commissionerate NTR District registered against the Respondent Nos.7 & 8 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, capricious and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 and ii consequently to direct the Respondents 2 to 6 to complete investigation and file charge sheet/final report expeditiously” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a direction may be given to the respondent/police to conclude the investigation in Crime No.230 of 2023 and file a final report. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed to conclude the investigation in the above crime and file a report in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.08.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.6604 of 2025 Dt.06.08.2025 Asr