Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 108767 (MAD)

THE MANAGEMENT OF KALLAKURUCHI v. M.VELU

WP/2336/2025 · 2025-01-29

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.2336 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.01.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.2336 of 2025 and WMP.No.2659 of 2025 The Management of Kallakuruchi Cooperative Sugar Mills Unit-I, represented by its Administrator/ District Revenue Officer Mr.Kannan Moongilthuraipattu 605702 Sankarapuram Taluk Kallakurichi District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.M.Velu 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Incharge) (Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972) Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour Vellore 10. ...Respondents 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2336 of 2025 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, by calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the second respondent in PGIA.No.101/2023 dated 21.08.2024 quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Kamaraj For Respondents : Mr.K.Surendran for R2 Additional Government Pleader ORDER This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order of the second respondent dated 21.08.2024. The second respondent is the Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act and by the said order he has condoned the delay of 4012 days, aggrieved by which the management has filed this Writ Petition. 2. I am unable to countenance the various submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that the delay is not 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2336 of 2025 properly explained etc., because the Delhi High Court in the judgement of M.C.D. Vs. Nand Kishore 2003 (97) FLR 1581 has held that there is virtually no limitation at all prescribed under the Act for claim of gratuity and the same has been followed by learned Judge of this Court in WP.No.3222 of 2019 in Sri Muthukumaran Institute of Technology Vs. J.Rajalakshmi. 3. In view thereof, the very exercise itself being procedural in nature, I am not able to countenance the submissions made by the learned counsel for the management. Otherwise the contentions with reference to the merits of the matter are kept open for the Management to contest the matter further before the Authority. 4. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 29.01.2025 Neutral Citation : No dna 1 2003 (97) FLR 158 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2336 of 2025 To The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Incharge) (Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972) Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour Vellore 10. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2336 of 2025 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J. dna W.P.No.2336 of 2025 and WMP.No.2659 of 2025 29.01.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis