Md. Saddam @ Md. Saddam Huassin v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./71129/2025 · 2025-11-28
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 108765 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 108765 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71129 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-779 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Saddam @ Md. Saddam Huassin Son of Late Md. Salauddin @ Md. Salahuddin Resident of Village - Naharpar, Phulwarisharif, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Uday Prasad , Advocate For the State : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP For the Informant : Mr. Jagjit Roshan, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. At the outset, learned A.P.P. for the State and
learned counsel for the informant have submitted that the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable as vide order dated 08.08.2025, proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued against the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner has got three criminal antecedents. In this connection, reliance is placed upon recent
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71129 of 2025(2) dt.28-11-2025 2/2
judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Prem Shankar Prasad versus the State of Bihar and Another reported in LL 2021 SC 579.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the fact that proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued and judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Prem Shankar Prasad (supra), the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.
shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T