Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2551 of 2025
----- 1.Rupesh Dhar Dubey 2.Sunesh Dhar Dubey, both S/o Rajgrihi Dhar Dubey 3.Rajgrihi Dhar Dubey, S/o Bikrama Dhar Dubey All R/o Village & P.O. Bishrampur, Ranka, P.S.- Bishrampur, District- Garhwa
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Respondent(s)
------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Ms. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P.
…......
03/ 28.04.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State
This is an application filed by the petitioners praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of Sections 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 apprehending their arrest for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) and 302(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegation is general in nature and injury is simple. He further submits that entire occurrence arises out of land dispute.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
From the arguments and also from the F.I.R. and document, I find that it is clear that the informant went to take possession over the land, for which they had entered into an agreement with the grandmother of petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and mother of petitioner No.3, when these petitioners obstructed them and assaulted them.
Since there is allegation of assault, I find that this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.20 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa, stands rejected.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./