Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10874 (AP)

Boganadham Vijaya Bhaskar v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7076/2021 · 2025-09-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010124212021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7076/2021 Between: 1. BOGANADHAM VIJAYA BHASKAR, S/O BOGANADHAM SUBRAMNYAM GUPTHA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O D.NO 4- 134/2, NAVATA TRANSPORT MAIN ROAD, KOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. KASETTY RAMADEVI, W/O VIJAYABHASKAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O D.NO 4-134/2, NAVATA TRANSPORT MAIN ROAD, KOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. KASETTY JAYAPRAKASH, S/O GURUNATHAM SETTY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RIO KOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAKADA CIRCLE, VAKADA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTA POLICE STATION, KOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ. direction, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in summoning the petitioners to the 2 police station frequently without there being any crime and paying domiciliary visits as illegal, arbitrary, malafidy, ultra virus and in violation of Article 21 of constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere with petitioners life and liberty in the interest of justice.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, by way of counter affidavit, would submit that the police are not summoning the petitioners to the police station and they are not interfering in the personal liberty of the petitioners. 3. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:18.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7076 of 2021 Dt.18.09.2025 Asr